Des milliers de militants des droits humains, d’universitaires et de figures du monde culturel demandent à Facebook de garder possible pour ses utilisateurs des critiques du gouvernement israélien
Rabbi Alissa Wise, directrice adjointe de la Voix juive pour la paix (Jewish Voice for Peace, USA) a déclaré en substance : Facebook renforce sa politique de lutte contre les discours haineux, mais pas dans un sens qui la rendrait plus protectrice. Le géant des réseaux sociaux ajoute désormais sioniste à juif ou israélien, mots soumis aux restrictions de la charte visant les discours haineux sur Facebook. Recourir à la notion de sionisme pour qualifier des actes du gouvernement israélien serait alors qualifié de discours haineux et supprimé des réseaux sociaux.
La pétition proposée par JVP et 30 autres organisations #FacebookWeNeedToTalk a déjà été signée par 30 000 personnes en une semaine ! Pouvez-vous aider à atteindre 50 000 ? Signez la pétition ici : facebookweneedtotalk.org/petition.
____
Ci dessous, le communiqué de presse du 27 janvier 2021, en anglais :
Facebook should refuse to cooperate with those building walls to keep people apart
BERKELEY CA — From across the globe, hundreds of activists, intellectuals and artists launched an open letter calling on Facebook to ensure that any amendments to its hate speech policy keep all people safe and connected. The petition garnered over 14,500 signatures in its first 24 hours.
Led by 31 organizations, the global campaign “Facebook, we need to talk” began in response to an inquiry by Facebook to assess if critical conversations that use the term “Zionist” fall within the rubric of hate speech as per Facebook’s Community Standards. Facebook may make a decision as soon as the end of February 2021. Zionism is a political ideology and movement that emerged in the 19th century and led to the founding of the state of Israel on Palestinian land; It has been deeply contested since its conception, including within the Jewish community.
Notable human rights activists and cultural figures such as Hanan Ashrawi, Norita Cortiñas, Wallace Shawn and Peter Gabriel have signed the petition, which notes that if Facebook restricts the usage of the word “Zionist,” it would prevent Palestinians from talking about their daily lives, shield the Israeli government from accountability for human rights violations, and do nothing to make Jewish people safer from antisemitism.
“We are deeply concerned about Facebook’s proposed revision of its hate speech policy to consider “Zionist” as a proxy for ‘Jew’ or ‘Jewish,’” the petition reads. “The proposed policy would too easily mischaracterize conversations about Zionists — and by extension, Zionism — as inherently antisemitic, harming Facebook users and undermining efforts to dismantle real antisemitism and all forms of racism, extremism and oppression.”
This attempt to stifle conversations about Zionist political ideology and Zionist policies — both of which have real implications for Palestinian and Israeli people, as well as Jewish and Palestinian people around the world — is part of an emerging pattern of political censorship by the Israeli government and some of its supporters. The most prominent example of these efforts to shield the Israeli government from accountability is the current campaign to impose the controversial IHRA working definition of antisemitism on campuses and civil society, and to codify it in government legislation. The IHRA definition conflates antisemitism with holding the Israeli government accountable for rights violations, stifling protected political speech that is necessary for healthy, open discussions about foreign policy and human rights.
After 12 hours the petition already had thousands of signers, including: Atilio Boron, Judith Butler, Michael Chabon, Noam Chomsky, Julie Christie, Richard Falk, Amos Goldberg, Marc Lamont Hill, Adnan Jubran, Ronnie Kasrils, Elias Khoury, Karol Cariola, Ken Loach, Miriam Margloyses, Ilan Pappe, Vijay Prashad, Prabir Purkayastha, Rima Berns-McGown, Jessica Tauane, Einat Weizman and Cornel West. (See facebookweneedtotalk.org/petition-text/english for a complete list of initial signatories.)
The campaign was launched by 7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media, Palestine Legal, MPower Change, Jewish Voice for Peace, Independent Jewish Voices Canada, Eyewitness Palestine, BDS National Committee, American Muslims for Palestine and Adalah Justice Project. (See below for a complete list of cosponsors.)
Rabbi Alissa Wise, Deputy Director of Jewish Voice for Peace: “If Facebook decides to add ‘Zionist’ to its hate speech policies, it will be in order to shield the Israeli government from accountability. This is not an earnest effort seeking to dismantle antisemitism on its platforms. Facebook should be focusing on those involved in white nationalist groups inciting violence, not Palestinians seeking to share their experiences living under Zionism with the world.”
Lau Barrios, Campaign Manager at MPower Change: “This move by Facebook would represent them actively siding against Palestinians and those fighting in solidarity alongside them for Palestinian liberation. It would also set a dangerous precedent around Big Tech’s ability to further target our movements and harm marginalized communities for simply sharing their lived experiences, such as life under apartheid. Facebook must stop harming and silencing Palestinians living under apartheid and start cracking down on white supremacist groups — like the Proud Boys — that have used their platform as a recruitment site and to push anti-Semitic, anti-Black, and Islamophobic rhetoric for years. That would require looking in the mirror. We hope they finally do so — and listen to Palestinians and the most impacted communities.”
Nadim Nashif, Executive Director of 7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media: “Suppressing critical discussion of Zionism and Zionists on the Facebook platform would be a political act that would severely restrict Palestinians and human rights defenders from communicating about the history and the lived reality of Palestinians.”
Liz Jackson, Senior Staff Attorney at Palestine Legal: “The policy Facebook is considering would be yet another tool to silence Palestinians and their allies who are trying to tell the world about the impacts of Zionism on their daily lives. Every year Palestine Legal hears from hundreds of people in the U.S. — Palestinians and their allies — who are censored, punished and harassed for speaking out for Palestinian freedom. The vast majority are accused of antisemitism because they criticized the political positions of Zionists, in defense of Palestinian lives. Facebook must resist this censorship, not reinforce it.”
To read the full text of the open letter, list of signatories, and background about the campaign, visit facebookweneedtotalk.org. For interviews with petition organizers or signatories, contact Sonya E. Meyerson-Knox at sonya@jvp.org or 929-290-0317.
Campaign background
We all want to connect. And social media can be a powerful tool to help us get past walls and share our stories, grow our networks and stand up for one another. But some politicians and governments are trying to turn these necessary guardrails into walls that keep us apart, generating fear and keeping us divided so they can avoid being held accountable for their actions.
Right now, Facebook is reaching out to stakeholders to ask if critical conversations that use the term “Zionist” fall within the rubric of hate speech as per Facebook’s Community Standards. Basically, Facebook is assessing if “Zionist” is being used as a proxy for “Jewish people or Israelis” in attacks on its platform.
Facebook may make a decision as soon as the end of February 2021.
This move is part of a concerning pattern of the Israeli government and its supporters pressuring Facebook and other social media platforms to expand their hate speech policies to include speech critical of Israel and Zionism – and falsely claiming this would help fight antisemitism. They are hoping that by mischaracterizing critical use of the term “Zionists” as anti-Jewish, they can avoid accountability for its policies and actions that violate Palestinian human rights. Such a move would do nothing to address antisemitism, especially the violent antisemitism of right-wing movements and states — which, as recent events have shown, is the source of the most tangible threats to Jewish lives.
Attempts to stifle conversations about Zionist political ideology and Zionist policies carried out by state actors — both of which have real implications for Palestinian and Israeli people, as well as Jewish and Palestinian people around the world — are part of an emerging pattern of political censorship by the Israeli government and some of its supporters.
The most prominent example of these efforts to shield the Israeli government from accountability is the current campaign to impose the controversial IHRA working definition of antisemitism on campuses and civil society, and to codify it in government legislation.
If Facebook does move to restrict use of the word Zionist, this would block important conversations on the world’s largest social media platform, harm Facebook users attempting to connect across space and difference, and deprive Palestinians of a critical venue for expressing their political viewpoints to the world. Palestinians need to be able to talk about Zionism and Zionists in order to share their family stories and daily lived experience with the world. That language is essential to clearly distinguishing between Judaism and Jewish people, on the one hand, and the State actors responsible for human rights violations against Palestinians, on the other.
###
Facebook, we need to talk campaign co-sponsors:
7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media
Adalah Justice Project
American Muslims for Palestine
Arab Resource & Organizing Center (AROC)
BDS México
BDS National Committee
Center for Constitutional Rights
Color of Change
Disciples of Christ Palestine-Israel Network
Eyewitness Palestine
Fight for the Future
Free Press
Free Speech on Israel
Friends of Sabeel North America (FOSNA)
If Not Now
Independent Jewish Voices Canada
Jewish Voice for Labour
Jewish Voice for Peace
Kairos Action
Los Otros Judíos
Media Justice
Movement Alliance Project
MPower Change
National Students for Justice in Palestine
National Lawyers Guild
Palestine Institute for Public Diplomacy (PIPD)
Palestine Legal
Palestine Solidarity Campaign, UK
Palestinian Youth Movement
South Africa BDS Coalition
US Campaign for Palestinian Rights
Traduction AFPS
Facebook, we need to talk, and you’re not letting us
Facebook, nous avons besoin de parler et vous ne nous laissez pas faire
Nous avons besoin de parler des meilleurs moyens de démanteler l’antisémitisme et tous les mécanismes de racisme, de sectarisme et de xénophobie qui y sont connectés.
Nous avons besoin de parler en tant que Palestiniens avec nos familles, nos amis et le reste du monde ; de partager ce que nous subissons dans notre vie de tous les jours, sous occupation militaire et à cause de la violence des colons sionistes.
Nous avons besoin de parler en tant que juifs, de discuter et débattre de nos nombreuses relations à l’idéologie politique sioniste.
Nous avons besoin de parler de la responsabilité du gouvernement israélien qui, comme tous les gouvernement, doit être responsable de ses actes, en mettant en lumière les violations des droits de l’Homme sur la plus grande plateforme de réseaux sociaux du monde.
Facebook nous avons besoin de parler.
Chers Mark Zuckerberg et Sheryl Sandberg,
Dans un monde cerné de murs, les réseaux sociaux sont un outil puissant qui nous aide à partager nos histoires, à nous soutenir les un·e·s les autres et aussi notre commune humanité, quelles que soient nos religions, origines ethniques ou nationalités. Nous savons que Facebook estime qu’il est de sa responsabilité de mettre en place des garde-fous pour que la plateforme reste sécurisée et accessible à nous tou·te·s afin que nous puissions nous relier dans l’espace et par-delà nos différences.
Mais nous sommes très inquiets : Facebook révise sa politique sur les discours haineux en considérant que le mot « sioniste » est employé pour signifier en fait « juif » ou « israélien ». En application de cette politique, des conversations sur les sionistes – et par extension le sionisme – seraient taxées d’antisémitisme inhérent, au détriment des utilisateurs de Facebook. Cela saperait les efforts pour mettre à bas le véritable antisémitisme et toutes les formes de racisme, d’extrémisme et d’oppression.
Nous ne pouvons pas nous débarrasser de l’antisémitisme si nous sommes empêchés d’exprimer nos opinions et de partager nos expériences. Nous pouvons discuter, débattre et même nous opposer, tant que nous partageons la conviction que tous et toutes nous avons droit à la sécurité, la liberté et la dignité. Nous demandons instamment à Facebook de ne pas ériger de barrières qui interdisent aux utilisateurs de se connecter entre eux alors que nous nous engageons dans cette tâche.
C’est la mauvaise solution à un problème réel et important : les personnes qui attisent en ligne l’antisémitisme continueront à le faire, avec ou sans le mot « sioniste ». En fait, bien des antisémites, surtout parmi les suprématistes blancs et les sionistes chrétiens évangélistes, soutiennent explicitement le sionisme et Israël tout en se livrant à des discours et des actions qui déshumanisent et isolent les Juifs.
De plus, et c’est important, cette modification interdirait aux Palestiniens de partager avec le monde leurs expériences quotidiennes et leurs histoires, que ce soit une photo des clés de la maison familiale perdue quand les milices sionistes l’attaquèrent en 1948 ou l’attaque en direct par des colons sionistes des oliveraies en 2021. Sans oublier le fait que cela empêcherait les utilisateurs juifs de Facebook de discuter de leur relation à l’idéologie politique sioniste.
Que Facebook scrute des termes spécifiques ne nous gardera pas du danger ; en revanche, cela nous empêchera d’échanger sur des problèmes politiques qui sont importants pour tous, et cela nous interdira de tenir des personnes et des gouvernements pour responsables de leurs actions et leurs politiques. Le gouvernement israélien actuel et certains de ses supporters ont exigé que Facebook ajoute le terme « sioniste » à sa politique sur les discours haineux – ce qui clorait toute conversation sur les responsabilités quant aux politiques et actions qui portent atteinte aux Palestiniens. Facebook doit refuser de coopérer avec ceux qui cherchent à construire toujours plus de murs pour nous diviser. Nous appelons Facebook à ne pas ajouter le terme « sioniste » en tant que catégorie protégée de sa politique sur les discours haineux.
